Les plans de gestion de crises dans les pays francophones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gestion des catastrophes, appelée plus communément gestion des situations d’urgences ou encore gestion de crises, est la discipline qui s’intéresse à l’évaluation des menaces et de leurs risques relatifs ainsi qu’aux stratégies mises en œuvre afin d’en limiter l’occurrence ou les conséquences en cas de survenue. Dans ce papier, nous allons étudier le cadre réglementaire et les mesures prises par les gouvernements pour gérer des situations exceptionnelles de crises dans quatre pays et une province canadienne (France, Belgique, Luxembourg, Maroc et Québec). Une étude comparative sur les structures des plans de gestion d’urgences dans ces pays/province a été menée, et nous a permis de mettre en exergue le rôle de la coordination entre les différentes parties prenantes afin de bien gérer la situation de crise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".