MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612563535 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2017.2691409

Leveraging Unused Resources for Energy Optimization of FPGA Interconnect

2017· article· en· W2612563535 on OpenAlexafffund
Safeen Huda, Jason H. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic demandEqual-cost multi-path routingInterconnectionRouting (electronic design automation)Static routingElectronic engineeringComputer networkEngineeringPower (physics)Routing protocolPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional field-programmable gate arrays are typically overprovisioned with routing resources to ensure that they meet routeability targets, which results in increased routing static and dynamic power. In this paper, we leverage the excess routing conductors to reduce dynamic and static power. To reduce dynamic power, we propose to ensure that used routing conductors are adjacent to unused routing conductors, which are left floating to reduce the effective capacitance seen by active nets. To reduce static power, we observe that leakage in routing multiplexers is dominated by specific paths; if the routing conductors, which connect to the input pins on these paths, are unused and left floating, the leakage of the multiplexer may be significantly reduced. To ensure that unused conductors are allowed to float requires the use of tristate routing buffers, and thus we propose two low-cost tristate buffer topologies with different power and area-overhead tradeoffs. We also introduce CAD techniques to optimize the overall energy dissipation in the routing network using the proposed techniques. Results show that interconnect dynamic power reductions of up to 25%, interconnect static power reductions of up to 81%, and overall interconnect energy reductions ranging between 14.9%-42.7% are expected, with a critical path degradation of <;1.8% and area-overhead of 2.6%-4.8%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207