MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La mobilité sur le campus Lyon Tech-la-Doua : approche systémique et scénarios en éco-mobilité

2017· article· fr· W2612592966 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Terrier, Chantal Berdier, Mathieu Bouyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDéveloppement durable et territoires · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente une approche systémique de la mobilité sur le campus LyonTech-La Doua. Un diagramme causal expose les interrelations entre les composantes du système de mobilité. Le modèle numérique de prédiction des impacts environnementaux, développé avec Vensim®, est alimenté par les résultats d’une enquête mobilité réalisée en 2012 sur le campus. Il intègre plus de 50 variables (modes de transport, répartition des usagers, vitesse, carburant, profil comportemental des usagers…) et propose des scénarios à court, moyen et long termes pour l’atténuation des impacts de la mobilité sur le campus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéveloppement durable et territoiresSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207