Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raised on a farm in southern Ontario, Gerald Hallowell attended the University of Toronto and Carleton University, where he acquired a taste for Canadian history. During a long career as an editor at the University of Toronto Press, interrupted by a few detours, he worked with authors to bring forward for publication several hundred books in the fields of Canadian history and literature. He maintained contact with potential authors by visiting universities and attending conferences across Canada and abroad, by sitting on various boards and belonging to associations, and he made difficult decisions about the publication of the results of research by historians and literary scholars. In this editorial role he was at the centre of scholarly publishing and academic life. As general editor of The Oxford Companion to Canadian History in his retirement, he was also at the centre of a large national enterprise. However, as someone who worked professionally in the field of history but did not teach in a history department as a university professor, he was also situated, quite satisfactorily in fact, on the edge of university life. These days he is researching and writing books about the town and county in which he lives, on the edge, in Nova Scotia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".