MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612691489 · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042507

Isotope shifts in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> transition of francium: Measurements and comparison to <i>ab initio</i> theory

2018· article· lv· W2612691489 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Kalita, J.A. Behr, A. Gorelov, M. R. Pearson, A. C. DeHart, G. Gwinner, Michael Kossin, L. A. Orozco, S. Aubin, E. Gómez, M. S. Safronova, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersAustralian Research CouncilUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of ManitobaTRIUMFNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFulbright CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDipolePhysicsAtomic physicsIsotopeExcitationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We observe the electric-dipole forbidden $7s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}8s$ transition in the francium isotopes $^{208\ensuremath{-}211}\mathrm{Fr}$ and $^{213}\mathrm{Fr}$ using a two-photon excitation scheme. We collect the atoms online from an accelerator and confine them in a magneto-optical trap for the measurements. In combination with previous measurements of the $7s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}7{p}_{1/2}$ transition we perform a King plot analysis. We compare the thus-determined ratio of the field shift constants (1.228 $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}$ 0.019) to results obtained from new ab initio calculations (1.234 $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}$ 0.010).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207