MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612702163 · doi:10.26563/dobras.v2i3.360

O figurino dos filmes de ficção científica

2008· article· pt· W2612702163 on OpenAlexaff
Vitalina Alves de Lima

Bibliographic record

VenuedObra[s] – revista da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas em Moda · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsCareer Trek
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os filmes de ficção científica passam por um período de interesse. Muitos estão sendo reeditados, coloridos e apreciados. Tornaram-se cult. Os fãs-clubes especializados são responsáveis por esse revival. Muitos criadores de moda elaboraram figurinos de qualidade ímpar para esses filmes. É um trabalho perigoso atrever-se a profetizar no vestuário. Alguns, os mais talentosos, conseguiram fazê-lo, porque também estudiosos de História transitam nos épicos do passado e inspiramse neles para imaginar o porvir. Nesse sentido, este artigo propõe um estudo arqueológico das roupas criadas para algum lugar do futuro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuedObra[s] – revista da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas em ModaSame topicCultural, Media, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207