Velocity Awareness in Vehicular Networks via Sparse Recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of velocity estimation in vehicular networks by exploiting the sparsity of vehicle velocity trajectory. First, we exploit the sparsity of vehicular velocity trajectories to reduce the beaconing load on the channel. To this end, we propose a sublayer that reduces the number of transmitted packets through a superframe. At each superframe, each vehicle transmits a few samples of its velocity as well as an encoded measurement of its past velocities. Sparse recovery of each velocity vector is performed at the receiver. We propose the use of repetitions at the medium access control (MAC) layer. Moreover, we extend our scheme into a streaming estimation system without the superframe concept. The streaming system uses a sliding window concept. We thoroughly study the estimation error of the streaming system, and we propose an algorithm to find the best solution over a streaming sliding window. The proposed superframe and streaming schemes are tested with real velocity traces collected in the city of Toronto to capture the performance in the city and highway conditions. Experiment results show that the proposed schemes significantly reduce the number of exchanged packets while preserving the velocity information with an excellent accuracy at the receiver. We also demonstrate how past velocity can be used to enhance vehicle localization accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".