O interminável (falso) debate em torno da obra de Durkheim: de Parsons a Alexander
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo Há alguns anos Jeffrey Alexander (1947-) sucedeu Talcott Parsons (1902-1979) como o sociólogo americano mais influente e, como Parsons, sua obra se construiu primeiramente através de uma reinterpretação crítica dos autores clássicos da sociologia. É, em grande medida, por meio de um estudo dos escritos durkheimianos, que conferem um estatuto particular ao livro As Formas Elementares da Vida Religiosa, que os dois autores elaboraram, cada um a seu modo, uma teoria voluntarista da ação social. Veremos ao longo deste artigo, que, para além das diferenças entre suas interpretações - fundadas sobre diferentes maneiras de identificar as etapas no desenvolvimento do pensamento durkheimiano -, Parsons e Alexander assemelham-se ao reduzir tal pensamento a uma teoria da ação social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it