MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612771207 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3018(17)30086-3

Improved life expectancy of people living with HIV: who is left behind?

2017· letter· en· W2612771207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet HIV · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineLife expectancyAntiretroviral therapyScopusTreatment as preventionPsychological interventionCohortHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Public healthFamily medicinePediatricsGerontologyViral loadMEDLINEInternal medicinePopulationPsychiatryEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been one of the great public health success stories of the past 40 years. ART has led to increased survival in people living with HIV, and subsequently to individual and societal gains worldwide, because of the marked improvements in its potency, side-effect profile, and simplicity of use.1Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort CollaborationLife expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies.Lancet. 2008; 372: 293-299Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1343) Google Scholar Results from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 052 study have clearly proven the efficacy of ART for prevention of transmission,2Cohen MS Chen YQ McCauley M et al.Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 493-505Crossref PubMed Scopus (5412) Google Scholar while the TEMPRANO and START studies have shown that early ART initiation reduces the risk of serious clinical conditions, the development of AIDS, and death.3Danel C Moh R et al.TEMPRANO ANRS 12136 Study GroupA trial of early antiretrovirals and isoniazid preventive therapy in Africa.N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 808-822Crossref PubMed Scopus (860) Google Scholar, 4Lundgren JD Babiker AG et al.INSIGHT START Study GroupInitiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection.N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 795-807Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Despite these improvements, cohort studies show a small but persistent gap in the lifespan between HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals, particularly within key affected populations.5Mills EJ Bakanda C Birungi J et al.Life expectancy of persons receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in low-income countries: a cohort analysis from Uganda.Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155: 209-216Crossref PubMed Scopus (306) Google Scholar, 6Losina E Schackman BR Sadownik SN et al.Racial and sex disparities in life expectancy losses among HIV-infected persons in the United States: impact of risk behavior, late initiation, and early discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy.Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49: 1570-1578Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar Recent data from NA-ACCORD show that a 20-year-old HIV-positive adult on ART in the USA or Canada has a life expectancy approaching that of the general population,7Samji H Cescon A Hogg RS et al.Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e81355Crossref PubMed Scopus (973) Google Scholar but this benefit is not shared by all. Specifically, individuals who are not white, have a history of injection drug use, or began ART with low CD4 cell counts have no reduction in mortality or improvements in life expectancy. In The Lancet HIV, the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) expands these findings over a longer timeframe using retrospective data from one of the largest collaborations in Europe and North America.8The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort CollaborationSurvival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies.Lancet HIV. 2017; (published online May 10)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30066-8Google Scholar Similar to NA-ACCORD, ART-CC found substantial improvements in mortality reduction and increased life expectancy in HIV-positive patients initiating ART. The ART-CC group surmises that these trends reflect superior antiretroviral agents, more options for patients developing resistance, fewer drug interactions, better management of opportunistic infections and chronic diseases, and the introduction of screening and prevention programmes for comorbidities in patients who benefited from treatment. However, life expectancy remains lower in people living with HIV than in the general population, and there is little evidence of a mortality reduction in people who inject drugs. In countries in the centre of the epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa, researchers have found that mortality in people living with HIV who are receiving treatment has been declining to levels similar to those described in participating North American cohorts.9Boulle A Schomaker M May MT et al.Mortality in patients with HIV-1 infection starting antiretroviral therapy in South Africa, Europe, or North America: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies.PLoS Med. 2014; 11: e1001718Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar Furthermore, recent data support that people living with HIV in countries such as South Africa can have a near-normal life expectancy, assuming they start ART before their CD4 count drops below 200 cells per μL.10Johnson LF Mossong J Dorrington RE et al.Life expectancies of South African adults starting antiretroviral treatment: collaborative analysis of cohort studies.PLoS Med. 2013; 10: e1001418Crossref PubMed Scopus (303) Google Scholar Although these findings suggest that results from cohorts in high-income countries can apply to low-income and middle-income countries, they might not be generalisable to countries where access to ART is limited, and challenges remain for all people living with HIV to access early treatment and stay in care. The concern is greatest in the world's most vulnerable populations, which include people who inject drugs in Europe and North America, and individuals living in resource-constrained settings globally, where access to early ART initiation has been limited. Beyond multiple structural barriers and the persistence of HIV-related stigma,11Maughan-Brown B Stigma rises despite antiretroviral roll-out: a longitudinal analysis in South Africa.Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 368-374Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar the previous era of inferior drugs and poor outcomes for patients has left a legacy that will be difficult to overcome. Fear of medication-related side-effects is a leading psychosocial barrier to treatment initiation and has led to concerns that ART might actually make a patient sick.12Govindasamy D Ford N Kranzer K Risk factors, barriers and facilitators for linkage to antiretroviral therapy care: a systematic review.AIDS. 2012; 26: 2059-2067Crossref PubMed Scopus (335) Google Scholar, 13Fox MP Mazimba A Seidenberg P Crooks D Sikateyo B Rosen S Barriers to initiation of antiretroviral treatment in rural and urban areas of Zambia: a cross-sectional study of cost, stigma, and perceptions about ART.J Int AIDS Soc. 2010; 13: 8Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar, 14Naik R Doherty T Jackson D et al.Linkage to care following a home-based HIV counselling and testing intervention in rural South Africa.J Int AIDS Soc. 2015; 18: 19843Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar Furthermore, restrictions in many regions on ART availability to individuals with low CD4 cells counts have created a perception that ART is reserved for individuals who are sick.15Katz IT Dietrich J Tshabalala G et al.Understanding treatment refusal among adults presenting for HIV-testing in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative study.AIDS Behav. 2015; 19: 704-714Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar These psychosocial barriers threaten to undermine the therapeutic and prevention benefits of ART in the test-and-treat era. Loss to follow-up care and treatment is typically greater in healthier individuals and, as the ART-CC study shows, health is also negatively associated with retention on ART. As efforts are scaled up to detect asymptomatic patients, the challenge will be to link these individuals to treatment and to optimise adherence. Interventions to increase awareness of the many positive benefits of early ART initiation and to allay fears of drug toxicity are needed, especially in individuals who feel healthy and might perceive ART as more of an immediate risk than a benefit. As the ART-CC group points out, although most future patients diagnosed with HIV are likely to start ART immediately (both for their own health and to prevent transmission to others), this approach will only result in improved survival if the problems of late HIV diagnosis and access to care are addressed. Although information about improved life expectancy in people living with HIV might motivate at-risk individuals to test for HIV or convince those infected that they should start ART immediately, current data in these populations suggest that knowledge alone might not provide an adequate incentive to overcome other obstacles to ART initiation and long-term adherence. We declare no competing interests. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studiesEven in the late ART era, survival during the first 3 years of ART continues to improve, which probably reflects transition to less toxic antiretroviral drugs, improved adherence, prophylactic measures, and management of comorbidity. Prognostic models and life expectancy estimates should be updated to account for these improvements. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it