MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2612812166 · doi:10.7202/1039383ar

Hallucinations, paranoïa, fantasme de destruction : le sujet en proie aux machinations du réel dans Le Ventre d’André Benchetrit et Le Pyromane de Thomas Kryzaniac

2017· article· fr· W2612812166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie-Hélène Voyer

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Par l’analyse des romans Le Ventre (1995) d’André Benchetrit et Le Pyromane (2013) de Thomas Kryzaniac, l’auteure étudie les ressorts d’un certain imaginaire de la surveillance qui se déploie dans tout un pan de la littérature actuelle. Un imaginaire qui s’érige sur diverses figures de l’absence ainsi que sur les motifs de l’infection et de l’invasion. L’attention extrême aux détails, de même que diverses stratégies de mise en récit de la dissolution et de la destruction y agissent comme autant de manières de pallier les défaillances de la perception qui constituent la source même de l’illusion conspiratoire des personnages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littéraires→Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research→French-language works237,207→