MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612850393 · doi:10.15173/esr.v19i1.534

HOUSEHOLD PREFERENCES FOR TIME-OF-USE RATES IN THE PORTUGUESE ELECTRICITY MARKET

2012· article· en· W2612850393 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
António Cardoso Marques, Júlio Fontes, José Alberto Fuinhas

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Studies Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantile regressionElectricityConsumption (sociology)PortugueseEconomicsEconometricsElectricity marketLogitOrdered logitNested logitLogistic regressionConsumer behaviourMicroeconomicsBusinessMarketingStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper contributes to the debate about peak-load pricing by making an analysis of the residential electricity market in Portugal. The results were built on techniques of logit regression complemented by quantile regression. We estimate the probability of choosing the Time-Of-Use electricity rate and the probability of reducing the Monthly Costs of Electricity by switching the rate for different consumer profiles. Factors such as consumer behaviour and knowledge are determinant when it comes to choosing differentiated rates. Our results suggest guidelines for defining policy measures that will promote an effective change in consumption periods and rate choices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Studies ReviewSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207