MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612851915 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/12/780

A First Principle Study of Vanadium Decorated Graphene Oxide As Novel Hydrogen Storage Material

2017· article· en· W2612851915 on OpenAlexaff
Sahida Kureshi, Andrey Tokarev, M. R. Cannon, Grace Quan, Erik Kjeang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneHydrogen storageVanadiumMaterials scienceBinding energyVanadium oxideOxideHydrogenInorganic chemistryTransition metalGraphene oxide paperCarbon fibersChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsMetallurgyComposite numberCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal functionalized graphene is good candidate for hydrogens storage material [1-3]. Transition metal atoms interact with carbon of substrate material through Dewar [4] and hydrogen molecules with Kubas [5] interaction and offer good binding energy. However due to higher cohesive energy of transition metals, synthesis of such material remains bottleneck. Boron-doping into graphene has been studied [6-8] to eliminate clustering of transition and alkali metal atoms. In this work, an alternate approach of using graphene oxide as base material is studied. Hydrogen adsorption in vanadium decorated graphene oxide is studied with density functional theory calculations based on generalized gradient approximation. The epoxyl and hydroxyl groups in graphene oxide can provide active sites for the binding of vanadium and help to mitigate the clustering problem. From the preliminary calculations, it is found that graphene oxide has very high binding energy of ~6.2 eV for vanadium, higher than the cohesive energy of vanadium (5.31 eV). Further, single vanadium atom can bind four H 2 molecules with an average adsorption energy of -0.5 eV. Graphene oxide is easy to synthesis and based on the value of vanadium binding energy it is easy to decorate with vanadium. Thus, vanadium decorated graphene oxide is promising material for hydrogen storage material. References: Yildirim T, Ciraci S. Titanium-decorated carbon nanotubes as a potential high-capacity hydrogen storage medium. Physical review letters. 2005 May 5;94(17):175501. Zhao Y, Kim YH, Dillon AC, Heben MJ, Zhang SB. Hydrogen storage in novel organometallic buckyballs. Physical review letters. 2005 Apr 22;94(15):155504. Durgun E, Ciraci S, Yildirim T. Functionalization of carbon-based nanostructures with light transition-metal atoms for hydrogen storage. Physical Review B. 2008 Feb 4;77(8):085405. Mingos DM. A historical perspective on Dewar's landmark contribution to organometallic chemistry. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 2001 Oct 15;635(1):1-8. Kubas Gregory J. Molecular hydrogen complexes: coordination of a. sigma. bond to transition metals. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1988 Mar;21(3):120-8. Park HL, Chung YC. Hydrogen storage in Al and Ti dispersed on graphene with boron substitution: First-principles calculations. Computational Materials Science. 2010 Oct 31;49(4): S297-301. Beheshti E, Nojeh A, Servati P. A first-principles study of calcium-decorated, boron-doped graphene for high capacity hydrogen storage. Carbon. 2011 Apr 30;49(5):1561-7. Tokarev A, Avdeenkov AV, Langmi H, Bessarabov DG. Modeling hydrogen storage in boron‐substituted graphene decorated with potassium metal atoms. International Journal of Energy Research. 2015 Mar 25;39(4):524-8. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207