Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la ville négro-africaine et sur les deux époques de son mode de production, soit la période qui précède la « balkanisation » et celle qui la suit. Cette réflexion mène à un examen de quelques pratiques urbanistiques se rapportant à l’armature urbaine, au modèle de structuration régionale depuis les ressources agricoles, et à l’urbanisation intensive. L’auteur constate que toutes ces pratiques, transposées consciemment ou non sur le sol négro-africain, sont devenues désuètes après les indépendances, car elles se butent aux réalités locales. Une brève conclusion permet de dégager un certain nombre de questions sur les pratiques urbanistiques postcoloniales. En vue d’éviter de nouvelles erreurs de conception, il est suggéré de repenser une nouvelle ville authentiquement négro-africaine qui pourrait s’appeler Afrikaville, car le décalage entre les modèles proposés et les forces en présence subsiste encore aujourd’hui.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".