MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2612932028 · doi:10.1039/c7cp00839b

Investigating the effect of ionic strength on the suppression of dendrite formation during metal electrodeposition

2017· article· en· W2612932028 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Pearson, Pon Kao, Anthony P. O’Mullane, Anand I. Bhatt

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDendrite (mathematics)MetalIonic bondingMaterials scienceChemical physicsChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgyIonEngineeringMathematicsGeometryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

or in the ionic liquid [EMIm][OTf]. The use of an ionic liquid allows a greater ionic strength to be investigated as the solubility limits of supporting electrolytes in organic solvents can be overcome using neat ionic liquid. The SEM and XRD data show that polycrystalline silver is deposited in a fcc structure and that dendrite formation is retarded at high ionic strength. Electrochemical measurements undertaken in electrolytes of low ionic strength indicate that the deposition and growth of a few nuclei is preferred and leads to dendrite formation. However, at higher ionic strength, the deposition and growth of significantly more nuclei is observed and therefore dendrite growth rates and tip currents are lower leading to the deposition of spherical particulates. Crucially, the data shows that if the ionic strength of the electrolyte is controlled there are no differences between ionic liquids and molecular solvents for the electrodeposition of silver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207