Des enfants-médiateurs et leur perception des objets et des personnages historiques d’un musée d’histoire au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: In our previous research (Martin, 2011), we studied the experiences of children (age 7 to 11) visiting science museums. We now shift our focus to history museums. This exploratory research dealing with a small group of “child-guides” aims to showcase the relationships between these children and exhibited museum objects and historical people. The collected words spoken by the children when presenting the exhibition (or in their “guide” role) will enable us to report the various exhibit approaches used by the Musée des Ursulines de Québec.KEYWORDS: Museum of History and Civilisation; child visitors; visit experience; presentation, understanding of heritage.KEYWORDS:Museum of History and Civilisation; child visitors; visit experience; presentation, understanding of heritageRésumé: Dans nos recherches précédentes (Martin, 2011), nous nous étions intéressés à l'expérience de visite des enfants (de 7 à 11 ans) dans les musées de sciences. À présent, nous portons notre intérêt à l’expérience de visite dans les musées d'histoire. Cette recherche exploratoire portant sur un petit groupe d'enfants-« guides » vise à mettre en évidence les relations établies par des enfants avec les objets du musée et les personnages historiques exposés. Les paroles des enfants ainsi recueillies lors de leur présentation de l'exposition (ou dans leur rôle de « guide ») nous permettront de rendre compte des différents modes d’approches de l'exposition du Musée des Ursulines à Québec.MOTS CLES: Musée d'histoire et de civilization; visiteurs-enfants; expérience de visite; interpretation; médiation du patrimoineMOTS CLES: Musée d'histoire et de civilization; visiteurs-enfants; expérience de visite; interpretation; médiation du patrimoine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".