The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style to Performance of Islamic Bank Bank with Work Motivation as a Mediating Variable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to examine and analyse the influence of transformational leadership style to performance of Islamic bank Bank with work motivation as a mediating variable. Achievement of objectives of Islamic banking organizations and individuals as well as members of units simultaneously organization is the primary task of a leader. A leader can influence his followers are required to execute commands without using coercion, so that subordinates voluntarily behave and perform as demanded by the organization through referrals leaders. Transformational leadership not only recognizes the needs of subordinates, but also trying to trying to improve the needs of lower levels to higher levels to the level established. The sample of this research was Islamic Bank Employees on South Sulawesi. Repeated measure t-test was used to analyse the data in which the significance was determined by p<0.05. The result showed that Transformational Leadership Style to Work Motivation significant effect. Transformational leadership style to performance of Islamic bank showed no significant effect. Work motivation to performance of Islamic bank showed no significant effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".