MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613224411 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0831

Nuclear quadrupolar spin-lattice relaxation with realistic phonon density of states in alkali halides

2017· article· en· W2613224411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Chandoul

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhononPhysicsDebye modelCondensed matter physicsAlkali metalAtmospheric temperature rangeHalideDebyeRelaxation (psychology)Lattice (music)Raman spectroscopySpin–lattice relaxationAtomic physicsThermodynamicsChemistryNuclear quadrupole resonanceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nuclear quadrupolar spin-lattice relaxation times T 1 have been calculated in alkali halides, whereby the phonon densities of states have been extracted from the shell model lattice dynamics. The calculations at room temperature were performed on 79 Br in KBr, NaBr, and RbBr; 23 Na in NaI, NaCl, and NaBr; 35 Cl in NaCl and KCl; and 127 I in NaI and KI. The obtained values of relaxation time T 1 are an order of magnitude smaller than those calculated with the Debye-model phonon density of states and agree well with experiments. The temperature dependence of acoustic and optical phonon contributions to the nuclear relaxation rate (first-order Raman phonon process) are carried out in the temperature range 20 to 300 K for 23 Na and 127 I in NaI. The role of optical phonons becomes important from 77 K on; the temperature dependence of T 1 agrees with experimental data throughout most of the temperature range studied (77–300 K), while differing quantitatively from the predictions obtained on the basis of the Debye model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207