Politiques universitaires et égalité des chances : les détours de l’histoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article retrace les grandes transformations du système universitaire québécois en identifiant les articulations entre les politiques universitaires et les orientations politiques générales. Deux grandes périodes se distinguent. Entre 1960 et 1980, la nécessaire croissance de l’enseignement supérieur et l’obligation pour le Québec de favoriser un accès plus large aux études supérieures sont mises en avant. Depuis 1980, l’influence croissante de la lutte contre le déficit public, le nouveau management public, la montée de la société du savoir et de l’éducation et la formation tout au long de la vie sont devenus référentiels d’action. La notion d’égalité des chances a connu une extension de définition et son statut dans l’action publique est modifié. Elle prend une place centrale dans le débat autour du financement des universités et de l’augmentation des droits de scolarité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".