Bibliographic record
Abstract
Khronos open source components, including the ICD and Clang compiler, require significant time and effort to manually download, build, and install. Source code updates to these components require recompilation, and developers must repeat error-prone steps to build new test environments. Ideally developers should be able to use a tool that automatically obtains, builds, and installs OpenCL codes, libraries, and tools. The Windsor Build and Testing Framework (WBTF) is a tool that has been developed at the University of Windsor that does this. This paper will discuss how the WBTF works, demonstrate how it is used, will show how OpenCL C and C++ programs can be built, run, and/or used to perform various header-only, link, and/or various conformance-style tests using OpenCL reference, host-installed, or using device-installed header and libraries. Those interested in OpenCL C/C++ development, the Khronos OpenCL Clang compiler, and in writing conformance tests will be interested in this framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".