Декомпозиция и совместный анализ циклов роста в динамике индикатора экономического настроения и индекса физического объема валового внутреннего продукта
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers potential of composite indicators of business tendencies surveys to measure short-term cycles of economic dynamics and presents the main results of the empirical study of the Economic Sentiment Indicator (ESI HSE), combining key information on sectoral surveys business trends in real, consumer and service sectors of the Russian economy for the I quarter 1998 - I quarter 2014. The main goal of the study is an answer to questions about admissibility to use business tendencies monitoring results in composition of the national information infrastructure. Do, for example, short-term trends of economic sentiment reflect the basic trajectory of real economy development for the period under review? Is it possible to use ESI HSE time series as an indicator of phases and turning points of growth cycles in the dynamics of statistical macro-aggregates, namely, volume index of the Gross Domestic Product? Key findings indicate scientifically valid ability of business tendencies monitoring indicators to be a part of the national corpus of short-term cyclical indicators and statistically significant admissibility of their practical usage in this capacity. This expands considerably information capabilities of business tendencies monitoring in structural-spatial analysis of entrepreneurial behavior and in identification of cyclical development of the economy of the country in temporal aspect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".