Rousseau et l’éducation : apports et tensions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous présentons brièvement la pensée éducative ressortant des écrits de Jean-Jacques Rousseau au 18 e siècle, pour ensuite la mettre en tension avec certaines théories de l’apprentissage qui ont cours aujourd’hui. Nous cherchons à mettre en lumière en quoi Rousseau peut encore contribuer aujourd’hui à penser l’éducation, mais aussi en quoi sa pensée est en tension avec certains paradigmes contemporains. Nous concluons en soulignant la nécessité de réfléchir à tous les principes de l’enseignement/apprentissage en tenant compte de la finalité de contribuer au développement d’un être humain au potentiel unique, capable de devenir un être autonome et libre, participant activement à son devenir et à celui de la société.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it