MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613482929 · doi:10.2337/db16-1074

SOX4 Allows Facultative β-Cell Proliferation Through Repression of <i>Cdkn1a</i>

2017· article· en· W2613482929 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric E. Xu, Shugo Sasaki, Thilo Speckmann, Cuilan Nian, Francis C. Lynn

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation United States of America
KeywordsSOX4Knockout mouseBiologyCell cycleCell growthEndocrinologyInternal medicineGene knockoutBeta cellCellCell biologyIsletDiabetes mellitusGene expressionGeneGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high-mobility group box transcription factor SOX4 is the most highly expressed SOX family protein in pancreatic islets, and mutations in Sox4 are associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. We used an inducible β-cell knockout mouse model to test the hypothesis that Sox4 is essential for the maintenance of β-cell number during the development of type 2 diabetes. Knockout of Sox4 at 6 weeks of age resulted in time-dependent worsening of glucose tolerance, impairment of insulin secretion, and diabetes by 30 weeks of age. Immunostaining revealed a decrease in β-cell mass in knockout mice that was caused by a 39% reduction in β-cell proliferation. Gene expression studies revealed that induction of the cell cycle inhibitor Cdkn1a was responsible for the decreased proliferation in the knockout animals. Altogether, this study demonstrates that SOX4 is necessary for adult β-cell replication through direct regulation of the β-cell cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207