MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613498082 · doi:10.7202/1035023ar

Solidarité-psychiatrie : une réponse alternative à la folie

2016· article· fr· W2613498082 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Letendre, Monique Panaccio

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Community Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La mise sur pied du groupe Solidarité-psychiatrie, projet autonome orienté et géré par ses membres, guidé par des balises psychanalytiques et fondé sur l’idée d’« institution éclatée » est une recherche d’alternative au traitement de la souffrance mentale par l’institution psychiatrique. Il regroupe des personnes désireuses de constituer un réseau où l’entraide côtoie la recherche et où la folie est envisagée sous ses angles psychologiques, socio-économiques et culturels. Solidarité-psychiatrie représente pour ses membres une manière de prendre sa folie en main, un réseau de vie où l’on utilise les éléments curatifs de la vie quotidienne pour en arriver à un mieux-être individuel et collectif. Il est aussi un collectif qui dénonce les faiblesses, irrégularités et injustices des « traitements » psychiatriques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of Community DevelopmentSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207