MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613504639

Infrastructure for secure medical image sharing between distributed PACS and DI-r systems.

2013· dissertation· en· W2613504639 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Krupa Anna Kurlakose

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityDICOMImage sharingInternet privacyBusinessImage (mathematics)Operating systemComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent developments in information and communication technologies and their incor-\nporation into the medical domain have opened doors for the enhancement of health care\nservices and thereby increasing the work \now at a reasonable rate. However, to implement\nsuch services, current medical system needs to be \nexible enough to support integration\nwith other systems. This integration should be achieved in a secure manner and the\nresultant service should be made available to all health professionals and patients. This\nthesis proposes a new infrastructure for secure medical image sharing between legacy\nPACS and DI-r. The solution employs OpenID standard for user authentication, OAuth\nservice to grant authorization and IHE XDS-I pro les to store and retrieve medical im-\nages and associated meta data. In the proposed infrastructure cooperative agents are\nemployed to provide a user action, patient consent and system policy based access con-\ntrol mechanism to securely share medical images. This allows safe integration of PACS\nand DI-r systems within a standard EHR system. In addition to this, a behavior-pattern\nbased security policy enhancement feature is added to the system to assist the system\nsecurity administrator. The resulting secure and interoperable medical imaging systems\nare easy to expand and maintain. Behavior of the entire system is analysed using general-\npurpose model driven development tool IBM Rational Rhapsody. The code generation\nand animation capability of the tool makes it powerful for running e ective simulations.\nWe mainly explore the use of state charts and their interactions with MySQL database\nto learn the behavior of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207