A realistic implementation for simulating side-channel in mobile ad hoc networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present the necessary methods and techniques for simulating a wide-band multi-hop side-channel between two distant peer nodes in a Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET). Simulating such a side-channel is helpful in understanding its potential and experimenting with its cyber warfare benefits, and for discovering effective ways to detect it. Implementing a content-bearing side-channel in which the full frame payload is used for messaging requires the ability to access the full communication stack in the simulator. We have implemented a fully functional multi-hop side-channel on the EXata/Cyber (QualNet) simulation tool to a level of detail where it could potentially be used in-line with applications such as voice or video for real-time, real-life emulations. We provide the details of our implementation and evidence of the benefits of such a side-channel via test scenarios. Such simulations may be used to facilitate military personnel's understanding of the effects cyber tools may have on their operations, in particular, Adaptive Dispersed Operations where military units are mobile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it