MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613542750

Cronebane Halfpenny Tokens: A Quick Guide To Counterfeit Coins

2017· book· en· W2613542750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) · 2017
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCounterfeitSecurity tokenReignIrishEconomic shortageHistoryIdentification (biology)Key (lock)George (robot)GenealogyCommerceComputer scienceComputer securityBusinessArchaeologyPolitical scienceLawArt historyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cronebane Halfpenny Tokens is a quick identification key to all the known counterfeit tokens that were produced between 1789 and 1816. The tokens were used by the Irish Associated Mining Company based in County Wicklow in Ireland to pay their workers during the coinage shortages during the reign of King George III. 
\n
\nThe Cronebane halfpenny became the most well known and most widely circulated Condor or trade token with 1.67 million original tokens produced by Mathew Boulton at his Soho Works in Birmingham. However, an estimated 3.0 to 4.5 million counterfeits tokens produced afterwards entering general circulation from the British Isles to Canada and Australia. This new key allows the none-specialist coin collector to rapidly identify these interesting and affordable coins that have wide historical significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1660.160

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.240
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin)Same topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207