MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613710394 · doi:10.7202/1040000ar

RÉGIME DE CHANGE ET CYCLICITÉ BUDGÉTAIRE DANS LES PAYS AFRICAINS

2017· article· fr· W2613710394 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amadou Bobbo

Bibliographic record

VenueL Actualité économique · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cet article est d’établir, empiriquement, la relation entre le régime de changes et la cyclicité budgétaire. Pour cela, nous estimons plusieurs variantes de la fonction de réaction des dépenses de consommation publique spécifiées en panel dynamique pour un échantillon de 34 pays africains sur la période 1980-2012. En utilisant la méthode des moments généralisés en différence (DIFF-GMM) telle que développée par Arellano et Bond (1991), et en adoptant la classification de facto de Reinhart et Rogoff (2004), nous parvenons à deux principaux résultats : (1) en régimes de change fixe et intermédiaire, la procyclicité budgétaire est amplifiée; (2) en régime flexible, celle-ci est affaiblie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.082 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Actualité économiqueSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207