MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613755130

Identity play in an artistic, interactive urban projection

2011· other· en· W2613755130 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey Shea, Michael Longford

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInteractive and Immersive Displays
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Mobile deviceProjection (relational algebra)PerceptionInternet privacyHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceMultimediaAestheticsWorld Wide WebPsychologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we review some emerging social interactions which are stimulated by the presence of large, public display screens. In particular, we consider the impact on the viewer’s perception of identity through the interaction of large screens with the private small screens of personal handheld devices, such as smart phones. Our research emerges from our experience creating Tentacles, a large screen public projection controlled by users’ phones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)Same topicInteractive and Immersive DisplaysFrench-language works237,207