MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

As novas tecnologias no contexto escolar: uma abordagem sobre aplicações do GeoGebra em trigonometria

2015· dissertation· pt· W2613788607 on OpenAlexaff
Jander Carlos Silva e Silva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsCentre de Géomatique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrigonometryContext (archaeology)Mathematics educationComputer scienceSoftwarePedagogyMultimediaMathematicsPsychologyGeometryProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents na approach to new Technologies in the educational context, with a view to applications of the GeoGebra in trigonometry. The goal is to guide teachers of the basic education in preparing lessons using GeoGebra, aiming to enrich trigonometry the in the classroom. The proposed activities are divided into three groups : basic trigonometry, trigonometry functions and trigonometry equations. Each one has a high level of details, in order to encourage the use by teachers with little or no knowledge of the software, and also encourage activities that promote the creation by the students. The idea is that students build the activities, learning how to use the software, interacting by moving objects, and taking their conclusions about the activities. In general, one intends to contribute to the development of logical thinking of students through the teaching of Mathematics adding the use of technology, so that the student is not only a spectator, but, participant of the construction of their own activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207