MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613794949 · doi:10.1177/2050312117708711

Effect of atypical antipsychotics on body weight in geriatric psychiatric inpatients

2017· article· en· W2613794949 on OpenAlexaff
Eugene Y. H. Yeung, Soojin Chun, Alan B. Douglass, Timothy Lau

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAripiprazoleRisperidoneMedicineOlanzapineWeight gainAntipsychoticWeight changeQuetiapineAtypical antipsychoticRetrospective cohort studyWeight lossPopulationBody weightInternal medicinePediatricsPsychiatrySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Obesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Studies suggest that antipsychotic-induced weight gain is not a great concern in the elderly population. This study investigated the weight change in elderly patients with various treatment duration and antipsychotics. Part 1 of the study was to determine whether atypical antipsychotics induced weight change in elderly patients. Part 2 was to determine whether certain atypical antipsychotics induced more weight change in elderly patients. Methods: In Part 1, a retrospective chart review was done on 115 geriatric inpatients. After exclusion, patients were divided into four groups: control ( n = 17), new treatment ( n = 18), long-term treatment ( n = 13), and medication switch groups ( n = 8). In Part 2, a retrospective medication review was performed on 169 geriatric inpatients. After exclusion, patients were divided into three groups: aripiprazole ( n = 18), olanzapine ( n = 49), and risperidone ( n = 57). Body weights were obtained at two different time points. Results: No significant difference in weight change was observed among the control (1.5 kg), new treatment (0.8 kg), long-term treatment (−0.3 kg), and medication switch (1.9 kg) groups. No significant difference in weight change was observed between patients with and without dementia (0.8 and 1.1 kg, respectively). The weight change in the aripiprazole group (−2.0 kg; −2.30% from baseline) was significantly different from the weight change in the olanzapine group (0.7 kg; 1.87% from baseline; p < 0.05), but not from the risperidone group (−0.4 kg; −0.45% from baseline). Clinically significant weight gain (>7% increase in body weight) occurred in 14.3% of the olanzapine patients, a percentage significantly higher than the 3.5% in the risperidone group. Conclusion: Although atypical antipsychotics were generally weight neutral in the geriatric population, aripiprazole and olanzapine were associated with significant weight loss and weight gain, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open MedicineSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207