MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613814252 · doi:10.15273/pnsis.v49i1.6984

A review of the monitoring and management of Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) in lowbush blueberrie

2017· review· en· W2613814252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrosophila suzukiiDrosophila (subgenus)Integrated pest managementBiologyPEST analysisWingHorticultureEcologyDrosophilidaeEngineeringDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent arrival of spotted-wing drosophilia (Drosophila suzukii) to eastern Canada is a major threat to the million dollar lowbush blueberry industry. The highly fecund female fly lays her eggs in ripe soft-skinned fruit. The maturing larvae consume the fruit interior, ultimately resulting in fruit collapse and decreased yield. Effective monitoring and management of this pest is essential for reducing the risk of export market closure and economic losses. In this literature review, an integrated pest management plan is developed that outlines current monitoring and management practices for the pest and considers preventative physical, chemical and biological controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it