MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613847904 · doi:10.1038/nbt.3790

Discovering and linking public omics data sets using the Omics Discovery Index

2017· letter· en· W2613847904 on OpenAlexaff
Yasset Pérez‐Riverol, Mingze Bai, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Silvano Squizzato, Young Mi Park, Kenneth Haug, Adam Carroll, Dylan Spalding, Justin Paschall, Mingxun Wang, Noemí del‐Toro, Tobias Ternent, Peng Zhang, Nicola Buso, Nuno Bandeira, Eric W. Deutsch, David Campbell, Ronald C. Beavis, Reza M. Salek, Uğis Sarkans, Robert Petryszak, Maria Keays, Eoin Fahy, Manish Sud, Shankar Subramaniam, Ariana Barberá, Rafael C. Jiménez, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone, Christoph Steinbeck, Rodrigo López, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Peipei Ping, Henning Hermjakob

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryWellcome Trust
KeywordsOmicsIndex (typography)Computational biologyData scienceData miningComputer scienceBiologyBioinformaticsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0120.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations222
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207