MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La gobernanza de la seguridad en Iberoamérica

2017· article· es· W2613857207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAraucaria · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de ChileYork UniversityEuropean Defence AgencyCentre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After more than 25 years of history the Ibero-American system is undergoing a process of institutional consolidation affected by the uninterrupted realization of political summits, the proliferation of specialized agencies and the execution of specific cooperation programs. Nevertheless, a matter of international and regional importance such as security has not yet received a comprehensive and continuous treatment, finding limited its reception to initiatives of partial scope and non-binding declarations. Despite the differences in strategic context, sub-regional cooperation schemes and agendas on both sides of the Atlantic, security policy management represents a necessary axis of work for Ibero-American States. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to substantiate the importance and timeliness of its inclusion in the system's action plans, as well as to outline possible lines of technical cooperation on the subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it