MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613886577 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56873-1_1

Introduction: Utopian Interventions and Their Relevance in the Contemporary Americas

2017· book-chapter· en· W2613886577 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kim Beauchesne, Alessandra Santos

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Psychological interventionSociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyLawPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beauchesne and Santos offer an introduction to the volume, contextualizing the origin of the concept to be explored by the contributors. The book reconceptualizes performing utopias in the Americas during the global era by bringing together the reflections of university scholars, artists, and community organizers from the United States, Canada, and Latin America. A singular aspect of the book is its bold combination of artistic texts, performances in and of themselves, and scholarly chapters. The introduction examines the volume’s main goal to provide thought-provoking insights on the topic of utopia from a wide array of different yet complementary perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207