MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2613901030

ALUMNOS DE INGENIERÍA, EN POS DEL PETROBOWL INTERNACIONAL. ENFRENTARÁN A ESCUADRAS DE TODO EL MUNDO

2017· article· es· W2613901030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gustavo Ayala

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2010-2016) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGarciaPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LUEGO DE GANAR LA COPA NORTEAMERICA­NA DE INGENIERIA PETROLERA PETROBOWL 2017, EN DENVER, COLORADO, ALUMNOS DE LA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA SE PRE­PARAN PARA PARTICIPAR EN LA COMPETENCIA MUNDIAL, A CELEBRARSE EL 4 DE OCTUBRE EN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. LOS UNIVERSITARIOS, QUE SUPERARON A 24 INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACION SUPERIOR DE ESTADOS UNIDOS Y CANADA, PRONOSTICARON QUE CONSEGUIRAN UN EXCELENTE LUGAR EN LA PROXIMA CONTIENDA, QUE REUNIRA A ES­CUADRAS DE EUROPA, ASIA, AFRICA, EL CARIBE Y SUDAMERICA. LA SEXTETA ESTA INTEGRADA POR CONSTANZA GARCIA SESIN, JULIO CESAR VILLANUEVA ALONSO, CESAR GARCIA MARMOLEJO, ENRIQUE AVILA TORRES, CESAR ALBERTO FLORES RAMIREZ Y MARCOS EMILIANO LOPEZ JIMENEZ, DE SEXTO Y OCTAVO SEMESTRES DE LA CARRERA DE INGE­NIERIA PETROLERA. EL CAPITAN DEL EQUIPO, ENRIQUE AVILA; ERNESTO MAGANA ARELLANO, ENTRENADOR DEL CONJUNTO PUMA; FERNANDO SAMANIEGO VER­DUZCO, ACADEMICO DE LA FACULTAD Y ASESOR DE LA ESCUADRA, Y LOS INTEGRANTES CESAR GARCIA Y CONSTANZA GARCIA, HABLAN DE SU PARTICIPACION EN JUSTAS ANTERIORES, DE LA RECIENTE COPA NORTEAMERICANA Y DE SU PREPARACION Y EXPECTATIVAS PARA LA COMPETENCIA MUNDIAL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2010-2016)Same topicOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesFrench-language works237,207