The Musical <i>Encart</i> of the Royal Printers Le Roy & Ballard in the 1583 Hours of Jamet Mettayer Held in the Musée de l’Amérique francophone in Quebec City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Heures de Nostre Dame, a l’usage de Rome: selon la Reformation de Nostre S. Pere pape Pie VI pour la Congregation roiale des penitens de l’Annonciation de Nostre Dame, printed at the request of King Henri III by Royal Printer Jamet Mettayer (Paris, 1583) and held at the Musée de l’Amérique francophone in Quebec City, is a rare example of a Book of Hours that contains music. The musical encart printed by the Royal Printers of Music Le Roy & Ballard (Paris, 1583) follows the texts of the Hours and totals thirty-six pages. This article focuses on the music in the encart and its relationship to the rest of the book, and on references to music in the statutes of the Congrégation. The musical encart is an essential part of this Book of Hours as it provides music for the Hours of the Virgin and the other offices celebrated by the Congrégation, as well as insight into their musical performance practices. Les Heures de Nostre Dame, a l’usage de Rome: selon la Reformation de Nostre S. Pere pape Pie VI pour la Congregation roiale des penitens de l’Annonciation de Nostre Dame, imprimées à la demande du roi Henri III par l’imprimeur royal Jamet Mettayer (Paris, 1583) et conservées au Musée de l’Amérique francophone dans la ville de Québec, sont un exemple rare d’un livre d’Heures contenant de la musique. L’encart musical imprimé par les Imprimeurs royaux en musique Le Roy et Ballard (Paris, 1583) suit le texte des Heures et compte trente-six pages. Cet article porte sur la musique de l’encart, ainsi que les références à la musique dans les statuts de la Congrégation. L’encart musical est une partie essentielle de ce livre d’Heures puisqu’il comprend la musique des Heures de la Vierge et des autres offices célébrés par la Congrégation, et ouvre une fenêtre sur les esthétiques d’interprétation de la Congrégation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".