In-Situ Dynamic Testing of Ground Support Using Simulated Rockbursts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG) is conducting a number of simulated rockburst experiments in Western Australian underground mines as part of its Mine Seismicity and Rockburst Risk Management research project. By simulating rockburst damage using blasting, it is possible to gauge the performance of complete ground support systems (incorporating rockbolts or cables, surface support and the connections between them) in-situ when subjected to strong ground motion, as would be generated by a large seismic event nearby. This paper describes the testing method used and presents the results of simulated rockburst tests at a number of Western Australian mines on various ground support systems. A dynamic support classification is shown which compares the dynamic capacity of the ground support systems tested. The test results are compared to ground support performance observed in actual rockburst case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it