MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ALGEBRAIC SURFACES WITH AUTOMORPHISMS

2015· dissertation· en· W2613995451 on OpenAlex
Matteo Bonfanti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomorphismAlgebraic numberMathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In my thesis I worked on two different projects, both related with projective surfaces with automorphisms. In the first one I studied Abelian surfaces with an automorphism and quaternionic multiplication: this work has already been accepted for publication in the Canadian Journal of Mathematics. In the second project I treat surfaces isogenous to a product of curves and their cohomology. Abelian Surfaces with an Automorphism The Abelian surfaces, with a polarization of a fixed type, whose endomorphism ring is an order in a quaternion algebra are parametrized by a curve, called Shimura curve, in the moduli space of polarized Abelian surfaces. There have been several attempts to find concrete examples of such Shimura curves and of the Abelian surfaces over this curve. In [HM95] Hashimoto and Murabayashi find Shimura curves as the intersection, in the moduli space of principally polarized Abelian surfaces, of Humbert surfaces. Such Humbert surfaces are now known ?explicitly? in many other cases and this might allow one to find explicit models of other Shimura curves. Other approaches are taken in [Elk08] and [PS11]. We consider the rather special case where one of the Abelian surfaces in the family is the selfproduct of an elliptic curve. We assume this elliptic curve to have an automorphism of order three or four. For a fixed product polarization of type (1, d), we denote by Hj,d the set of the deformations of the selfproduct with the automorphism of order j. We prove the following theorem: Theorem. Let j ? {3,4}, d ? Z, d > 0 and let ? ? Hj,d, so that the Abelian surface A?,d has an automorphism ?j of order j. Then the endomorphism algebra of A?,d also contains an element ?j with ?j^2 = d. Moreover, for a general ? ? Hj,d one has End(A?,d)Q =(?j,d)/Q where (a, b)/Q := Q1 ? Qi ? Qj ? Qk is the quaternion algebra with i^2 = a, j^2 =b and ij=?ji. It is easy compute for which d the quaternion algebra (?j,d)/Q is a skew field: for these d the general Abelian surface in the family Hj,d is simple. In particular this provides examples of simple Abelian surfaces with an automorphism of order three and four. This construction, together with well-known results about automorphisms of Abelian surfaces (see [BL04, Chapter 13]), leads to: Theorem. Let A be a simple Abelian surface and ? ? Aut(A) a non-trivial automorphism of finite order. Then ord(?) ? {3, 4, 5, 6, 10}. We focus in particular on the family H3,2 of Abelian surfaces with an automorphism of order three and a polarization of type (1,2). In [Bar87] Barth provides a description of a moduli space M2,4, embedded in P5, of (2, 4)-polarized Abelian surfaces with a level structure. Since the polarized Abelian surfaces we consider have an automorphism of order three, the corresponding points in M2,4 are fixed by an automorphism of order three of P^5. This allows us to explicitly identify the Shimura curve in M2,4 that parametrizes the Abelian surfaces with quaternionic multiplication by the maximal order O6 in the quaternion algebra with discriminant 6. It is embedded as a line in M2,4 ? P5 and the symmetric group S4 acts on this line by changing the level structures. According to Rotger [Rot04], an Abelian surface with endomorphism ring O6 is the Jacobian of a unique genus two curve. We show explicitly how to find such genus two curves, or rather their images in the Kummer surface embedded in P5 with a (2,4)-polarization. These curves were already been considered by Hashimoto and Murabayashi in [HM95]: we give the explicit relation between their description and ours. Moreover we find a Humbert surface in M2,4 that parametrizes Abelian surfaces with Z( 2) in the endomorphism ring. Cohomology of surfaces isogenous to a product Surfaces isogenous to a product of curves provide examples of surfaces of general type with many different geometrical invariants. They have been introduced by Catanese in [Cat00]: Definition. A smooth surface S is said to be isogenous to a product (of curves) if it is isomorphic to a quotient (C�D)/G where C and D are curves of genus at least one and G is a finite group acting freely on C � D. We say that a surface isogenous to a product is of mixed type if there exists a element of G interchanging the two curves; otherwise, if G acts diagonally on the product, we say that the surface is of unmixed type. A surface isogenous to a product is of general type if the genus of both curves, C and D, is greater or equal to 2: in this case we say that the surface is isogenous to a higher product. The cohomology groups of a surface S = (C � D)/G isogenous to a product of unmixed type are determined by the action of the group G on the cohomology groups of the curves. Moreover the action of an automorphism group G on a smooth curve C forces a decomposition of the first cohomology group, as described in [BL04, section 13.6] and in [Roj07]: Proposition (Group algebra decomposition). Let G be a finite group acting on a curve C. Let W1, ..., Wr denote the irreducible rational representations of G and let ni := dimDi (Wi), with Di := EndG(Wi), for i = 1, ..., r. Then there are rational Hodge substructures B1, ..., Br such that H1(C, Q) ? n1B1+...+nrBr. From this a decomposition of the cohomology groups of the surface S follows directly. We apply these results to surfaces isogenous to a higher product of unmixed type with ?(OS) = 2 and q(S) = 0: they have been studied and classified by Gleissner in [Gle13]. For these surfaces the Hodge diamond is fixed and in particular the Hodge numbers of the second coho- mology groups are the same as those of an Abelian surface. From Gleissner?s classification we obtain a complete list of the 21 possible groups G. We proved that the second cohomology group of these surfaces can be described explicitly as follows: Theorem. Let S be a surface isogenous to a higher product of unmixed type with ?(OS) = 2, q(S) = 0. Then there exist two elliptic curves E1 and E2 such that H2(S, Q) ?= H2(E1 � E2, Q) as rational Hodge structures. In general it is not possible to construct these elliptic curves ?geometrically? using the action of G. More precisely there are no intermediate coverings ?F : C ? C/F and ?H : D ? D/H, F, H ? G with C/F = E1 and D/H = E2: we can only prove that such elliptic curves must exist. The proof of the theorem is standard for all but four groups: in these cases we study one by one the corresponding surfaces in order to construct the elliptic curves. As a further application we use this approach to study some surfaces isogenous to a higher product with pg = q = 2, in particular those are of Albanese general type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it