Ototoxic drugs and sensorineural hearing loss following severe neonatal respiratory failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aim: To determine relationships between ototoxic drugs and 4‐y sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in near‐term and term survivors of severe neonatal respiratory failure. Methods: All 81 survivors of the Canadian arm of the Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study (mortality 32, loss to follow‐up 9) received loop diuretics, aminoglycosides, and neuromuscular blockers (NMB), and 50 received vancomycin as neonates. Prospective, longitudinal secondary outcome using audiological tests diagnosed late‐onset, progressive SNHL in 43 (53%); not flat (sloping) in 29, flat (severe to profound) in 14. Risk for SNHL was determined. Results: A combination of duration of diuretic use of >14 d and average NMB dose of >0.96 mg/kg/d contributed to SNHL among survivors (odds ratio 5.2; 95% CI 1.6, 16.7). Markers of illness severity did not contribute. Dosage or duration of aminoglycosides use did not relate to SNHL. Cumulative dosages and duration of use of diuretics; NMB; use of vancomycin; and overlap of diuretics with NMB, aminoglycosides, and vancomycin individually linked to SNHL ( p <0.001). Conclusion: Overuse of loop diuretics and/or NMB contributes to SNHL after neonatal respiratory failure; markers of illness severity or the appropriate administration of aminoglycosides do not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".