MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614312060 · doi:10.1002/cepa.23

Glas‐Sandwich‐Fassade – Entwicklung einer neuen Fassadentypologie

2017· article· de· W2614312060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuece/papers · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacadeHumanitiesEngineeringStructural engineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die Glas‐Sandwich‐Fassade ist eine Warmfassade und besteht aus transparenten und nicht transparenten Glasflächen mit Wärmedämmung. Das Fassadensystem verbindet das opake Bauelement GSP® (Glass Sandwich Panel) mit herkömmlichen Fenster‐ und Fassadenprofilen. Die horizontale und vertikale Verlegerichtung sowie die Anschlussmöglichkeiten zu herkömmlichen Fassadensystemen ermöglichen vielfältige Einsatzmöglichkeiten mit einer hochwertigen opaken Glasoberfläche. Dieser Beitrag diskutiert zunächst die grundlegende Entwicklung vom Glass Sandwich Panel und zeigt anschließend die Anwendung von horizontal verlegten Paneelen mit integrierten Fensterelementen. Im Gegensatz zum klassischen Sandwich‐Fassadenbau ist für die Fenster‐ und Öffnungsbereiche keine entkoppelte Tragkonstruktion notwendig. Der Lastabtrag erfolgt über Adapterprofile und Sandwich‐Paneele. Aus diesem Grund wird ein neues Nachweiskonzept entwickelt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it