MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Signatures of a gearwheel quantum spin liquid in a spin-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:math> pyrochlore molybdate Heisenberg antiferromagnet

2017· article· lv· W2614468610 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Materials · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of WaterlooCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Research CouncilCanada Research ChairsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPyrochloreAntiferromagnetismSpin (aerodynamics)Reciprocal latticeQuantum spin liquidHeisenberg modelNeutron scatteringQuantumParamagnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We theoretically investigate the low-temperature phase of the recently synthesized ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Mo}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{5}{\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ material, an extraordinarily rare realization of a $S=1/2$ three-dimensional pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet in which ${\mathrm{Mo}}^{5+}$ are the $S=1/2$ magnetic species. Despite a Curie-Weiss temperature (${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Theta}}}_{\mathrm{CW}}$) of $\ensuremath{-}121(1)$ K, experiments have found no signature of magnetic ordering $\mathit{or}$ spin freezing down to ${T}^{*}\ensuremath{\approx}0.5$ K. Using density functional theory, we find that the compound is well described by a Heisenberg model with exchange parameters up to third nearest neighbors. The analysis of this model via the pseudofermion functional renormalization group method reveals paramagnetic behavior down to a temperature of at least $T=|{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Theta}}}_{\mathrm{CW}}|/100$, in agreement with the experimental findings hinting at a possible three-dimensional quantum spin liquid. The spin susceptibility profile in reciprocal space shows momentum-dependent features forming a ``gearwheel'' pattern, characterizing what may be viewed as a molten version of a chiral noncoplanar incommensurate spiral order under the action of quantum fluctuations. Our calculated reciprocal space susceptibility maps provide benchmarks for future neutron scattering experiments on single crystals of ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Mo}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{5}{\mathrm{N}}_{2}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207