Constats du CALQ No.3 / Conseil des arts et des lettres du Quebec - Novembre 2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
*Conclusion. La diffusion internationale des productions quebecoises en arts de la scene represente aujourd’hui un enjeu important pour les organismes artistiques de ce secteur. Conquerir de nouveaux marches pour accroitre la duree de vie des productions et faire rayonner les �uvres quebecoises hors des frontieres locales et nationales est devenu une necessite dans un contexte de mondialisation. Un contexte qui influence le marche culturel et qui impose dorenavant une concurrence des plus vives, meme au Quebec. Les renseignements regroupes et presentes dans ce document visent a augmenter la connaissance entourant la diffusion des �uvres quebecoises sur la scene internationale, en precisant les caracteristiques des organismes et des tournees realisees en 2000-2001, avec un soutien financier du Conseil des arts et des lettres du Quebec. Bien que l’analyse proposee ici se limite a ces organismes et a leurs tournees, il n’en demeure pas moins que les resultats fournissent un eclairage nouveau qui permettent de documenter et de mieux cerner cette realite. (...)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".