MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614520926 · doi:10.3406/dsedu.2002.978

L’éducation préscolaire au Québec : bilan et perspectives

2002· article· en· W2614520926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Johanne Bédard, François Larose, Bernard Terrisse

Bibliographic record

VenueLes dossiers des sciences de l éducation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeCurriculumArticulation (sociology)Early childhoodMathematics educationEarly childhood educationPoint (geometry)Special educationPedagogyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPolitical scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we do notice a compensatory function to the preschool education in Québec. We then distinguish the conditions in which the day care centers (todlers and early childhood) and the kindergarten (4 to 5 years old kids) emerged as two complementary type of services, especially by the mid eightees. If complementary, their educational missions are different and we do emphacize on this difference. We also briefly describe and analyze the evolution of the epistemological basis of the successive versions of the Québec’s preschool education curriculum from 1981 to nowadays, making a specific point with the main challenges that are specific to the kindergarten within ongoing the curricular reform process. We finish this paper reflecting on the various problems that a better articulation between the preschool and the elementary education is presenting, particularly by not exclusively for the preservice teachers education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.553
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes dossiers des sciences de l éducationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207