Diabetes recurrence after metabolic surgeries correlates with re-impaired insulin sensitivity rather than beta-cell function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To investigate factors causing diabetes recurrence after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB). METHODS: SG and DJB were performed on rats with diabetes induced by high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ). HFD was used to induce diabetes recurrence at 4 wk postoperatively. Body weight, oral glucose tolerance test, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), insulin signaling [IR, insulin receptor substrate (IRS)1, IRS2, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and AKT in liver and skeletal muscle], oral glucose stimulated insulin secretion, beta-cell morphology (mass, apoptosis and insulin secretion), glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, PYY and ghrelin were compared among SG rats with common low-fat diet (SG-LFD), SG with HFD (SG-HFD), DJB rats with LFD (DJB-LFD), DJB with HFD (DJB-HFD) and sham-operation with LFD (Sham) at targeted postoperative times. RESULTS: SG and DJB resulted in significant improvement in glucose tolerance, lower HOMA-IR, up-regulated hepatic and muscular insulin signaling, higher levels of oral glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, bigger beta-cell mass, higher immunofluorescence intensity of insulin, fewer transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin 3' nick end-labeling (TUNEL)-positive beta cells and higher postprandial GLP-1 and PYY levels than in the Sham group. The improvement in glucose tolerance was reversed at 12 wk postoperatively. Compared with the SG-LFD and DJB-LFD groups, the SG-HFD and DJB-HFD groups showed higher HOMA-IR, down-regulated hepatic and muscular insulin signaling, and more TUNEL-positive beta cells. No significant difference was detected between HFD and LFD groups for body weight, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, beta-cell mass, immunofluorescence intensity of insulin, and postprandial GLP-1 and PYY levels. Fasting serum ghrelin decreased in SG groups, and there was no difference between HFD-SG and LFD-SG groups. CONCLUSION: HFD reverses the improvement in glucose homeostasis after SG and DJB. Diabetes recurrence may correlate with re-impaired insulin sensitivity, but not with alterations of beta-cell function and body weight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".