Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’appuie sur une recherche qualitative visant à mieux comprendre l’expérience religieuse de jeunes croyants en contexte sécularisé. À partir de douze entretiens semi-dirigés réalisés auprès de jeunes croyants qui adhèrent à différentes traditions religieuses, l’article aborde les défis que posent l’adhésion et l’affirmation religieuse par l’entremise de : 1) la perception des représentations sociales dominantes de la religion du point de vue de jeunes croyants et 2) la perception de la réaction de leur entourage vis-à-vis leur identification en tant que croyants, de même que les stratégies déployées par ces jeunes en réponse aux représentations et réactions estimées. L’article montre que le contexte sécularisé influence de manière significative leur expérience religieuse, les jeunes étant régulièrement amenés à négocier leur identification religieuse et la pratique de leur religion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".