MP27: Costs of emergency syncope care in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Syncope is a common emergency department (ED) presentation and constitutes 1% of all ED visits, approximately 160,000 visits annually across Canada. Lack of standardized syncope care has economic and cost implications. Currently, emergency medical services (EMS) is over utilized, variations in ED management exist and a substantial proportion (46.5%) are hospitalized for cardiac monitoring. Our previous studies have proposed ways to reduce health care utilization through development of EMS clinical decision tool, ED risk scores and remote cardiac monitoring. We sought to: 1) Estimate costs associated with syncope care in the pre-hospital, ED and inpatient settings; and 2) Determine potential cost savings if the proposed alternate strategies were adopted. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in five Canadian EDs from 2010-2014. We enrolled adult (≥16 years) syncope patients and excluded those with prolonged loss of consciousness, mental status changes, seizure, significant trauma, or alcohol/illicit drug abuse. Demographics, medical history, mode of arrival, EMS time points, reasons for hospitalization, ED and inpatient length of stay, final ED diagnosis and any serious adverse event within 30 days of index visit were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Results: Out of 4,064 patients enrolled, 67.3% were transported to the ED by EMS and the average cost per event was $262.78 (range at study sites: $156.43-$553.03). The average cost per ED visit was $267.98 (range: $174.66-$374.95). 12.9% of the patients were admitted and the average of cost per admission was $9,886.15 (range: $9,715.23-$10,277.98). Syncope is associated with an estimated total annual cost of $257 million. In Canada, we estimate that diverting low-risk patients will save $5 million in the pre-hospital setting and $15 million in the ED annually, and implementing a remote cardiac monitoring strategy will save $50 million annually. Conclusion: It is estimated that the proposed strategies will save $70 million annually. This is likely an underestimation as cost savings due to reduction in investigations related to diversion of ED patients, reduction in ED length of stay and hospitalization are unaccounted. Adoption of similar strategies will likely lead to significantly higher cost savings in countries with higher resource utilization for syncope management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".