MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614762155 · doi:10.5377/ryr.v36i0.3614

Desarrollo de Formulado para Teñido Orgánico con Añil

2017· article· es· W2614762155 on OpenAlexaff
José Alberto Mendez, Patricia G. Bernal, Delmi Linares, Elizabeth M. Crown

Bibliographic record

VenueRealidad y Reflexión · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation has been conducted for the development of an organic formulated in the indigo dyeing of natural fibers, which is friendly to the environment, and with zero impact on health and dyers. The research reported here found that it is possible to dye fiber fabrics 100% cotton with entirely organic process, where the components of the formulation are natural products that cause no adverse impact to the environment, as follows: wheat bran and reducing agents molasses and hydrated lime agent alkalinity control. As seen below, the ideal parameters were established in the concentration of each of the components: minimum size of the bath, by mixing the components, protocols fermentation processes and dyeing. The results showed that dyeing with established organic formulated dyed fabrics are 100% cotton with good fastness to washing and rubbing, with very little bleeding after overage fabrics indigo dye.Realidad y Reflexión Year 12, No.36, September-December 2012: 43-67

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRealidad y ReflexiónSame topicPlant and soil sciencesFrench-language works237,207