MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614873513 · doi:10.1515/ijfe-2016-0263

A Comparative Study of Combined Microwave Techniques for Longan ( <i>Dimocarpus longan</i> Lour.) Drying with Hot Air or Vacuum

2017· article· en· W2614873513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrinkageLightnessMicrowaveMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryFood scienceProcess engineeringComposite materialChemistryPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of this study is to find a better drying method to replace conventional hot air drying (HAD) in terms of faster, energy efficient and better product quality. Two alternative drying techniques, microwave combined with hot air drying (MHD) and microwave vacuum drying (MVD), are compared in this study to dry peeled and destoned longan fruit. Both MHD and MVD reduced the drying time up to 48 % and energy consumption as compared to HAD. These techniques provided lower product redness, yellowness and shrinkage but higher lightness and porous structure as compared to HAD. MVD reduced hardness and toughness of the dried product. MHD provided the highest preference score in terms of colour and shape and was as acceptable as the commercial product dried by HAD. MHD is the most suitable method for longan drying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it