PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE METIS-NEWDEAL® TOTAL METATARSOPHALANGEAL PROSTHESIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary results from the METIS-Newdeal(®) metatarsophalangeal prosthesis for treating hallux rigidus grade III/IV. METHODS: This was a prospective study on eight metatarsophalangeal prostheses that were placed in six patients between November 2007 and July 2009. The patients' mean age was 55 years and the mean follow-up after the surgery was 50 weeks. The results were evaluated using the AOFAS-MTP score and x-ray images as controls. RESULTS: The AOFAS-MTP score increased significantly from 42p before the surgery to 82p after the surgery (↑ 1.95x), mainly due to improvement in the functional level. No intercurrences were identified radiologically. Among the five patients who underwent operations, only one expressed dissatisfaction with the surgery: this was expressed after early infection appeared at the surgical site, and it was the only postoperative complication found. CONCLUSION: Total metatarsophalangeal arthroplasty using METIS-Newdeal(®) presented promising short-term results. However, evaluations on a larger number of cases with a longer follow-up are needed in order to draw more consistent conclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".