MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Narrow Range of Wavelengths Active in Regulating Apothecial Development in <i>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</i>

2000· article· en· W2614894267 on OpenAlex
C. Thaning, Henrik Nilsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phytopathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsAscocarpSclerotinia sclerotiorumPhototropismPhotomorphogenesisBiologyBotanyAbsorbanceBlue lightOpticsPhysicsArabidopsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three Swedish and one Canadian isolate of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were tested for apothecial formation in light of different wavelengths and for measuring light absorbance of macerated apothecia and apothecia filtrate in a spectrophotometer. The apothecial formation was recorded after keeping laboratory‐produced sclerotia under different light filters illuminated by True‐Lite fluorescent tubes. The experiments, performed at room temperature, demonstrated that normal apothecia developed only in light of wavelengths between 276 and 319 nm, and that macerated apothecia and apothecia filtrate absorbed light at the same wavelengths with a maximum absorbance at 310 nm. The stipes showed a clear positive phototropism in light that was not essential for apothecia development. indicating that there may be different photoreceptors for phototropism and photomorphogenesis. Negative phototropism of stipes occurred at certain wavelengths in yellow light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it