A Narrow Range of Wavelengths Active in Regulating Apothecial Development in <i>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Three Swedish and one Canadian isolate of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were tested for apothecial formation in light of different wavelengths and for measuring light absorbance of macerated apothecia and apothecia filtrate in a spectrophotometer. The apothecial formation was recorded after keeping laboratory‐produced sclerotia under different light filters illuminated by True‐Lite fluorescent tubes. The experiments, performed at room temperature, demonstrated that normal apothecia developed only in light of wavelengths between 276 and 319 nm, and that macerated apothecia and apothecia filtrate absorbed light at the same wavelengths with a maximum absorbance at 310 nm. The stipes showed a clear positive phototropism in light that was not essential for apothecia development. indicating that there may be different photoreceptors for phototropism and photomorphogenesis. Negative phototropism of stipes occurred at certain wavelengths in yellow light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".